1. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors of The Hospital Contribution Fund
of Australia Limited (HCF) is responsible for the corporate
governance of the consolidated entity. The Board guides
and monitors the business and affairs of the HCF Group.
1.1 Profile of HCF
HCF is registered under the Corporations Act 2001 as a public
company limited by guarantee. It is also registered under the
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 as a private health insurer.
HCF has no share capital, no shareholders and no borrowings.
It is operated on a not for profit basis as HCF’s Constitution
prohibits any distribution of surplus or assets to its Members.
HCF is governed by a Board of Directors. In addition to the
circumstances in which any Director may be removed or retire
by rotation, HCF’s Constitution and the Corporations Act 2001 empowers the Members of HCF to remove any Director by
ordinary resolution at a general meeting. HCF’s Constitution
also mandates that every five years an independent expert must
review HCF’s corporate governance structure to determine
whether it is operating efficiently and as intended and reflects
then current best practice, and whether any refinements or
changes to it should be submitted to Members for approval.
A reference to or statement about HCF relates to all companies
within the HCF Group. The operating companies within the
HCF Group are The Hospitals Contribution Fund Of Australia
Limited, HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited and
Manchester Unity Australia Limited and its subsidiary
Treytell Pty Limited.
1.2 Policy, framework and approach to corporate governance
HCF’s policy on corporate governance is to have a culture,
including appropriate values and behaviours, that underpins its
everyday activities, ensures transparency and accountability
and protects stakeholder interests. This policy includes a
commitment to best practice governance standards, which the
Board sees as fundamental to the sustainability of HCF’s
businesses and performance.
In pursuing this commitment, the Board continues to:
- monitor Australian developments in best practice
corporate governance;
- contribute to debates on what represents best corporate
governance for the health and life insurance industries; and
- review and improve its governance practices.
HCF has taken into account the “Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations” published in August 2007
(“Best Practice Recommendations”) by the Australian Stock
Exchange Limited’s Corporate Governance Council [ASXCGC],
Australian Standard AS8000 – Good Governance Principles,
Private Health Insurance Administration Council’s Industry
Corporate Governance Guidelines [PHIACICGG], Private
Health Insurance Code of Conduct developed under the auspices
of the Australian Health Insurance Association and so far as HCF’s
subsidiaries; HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited and
Manchester Unity Australia Ltd are concerned, the Australian
Prudential Regulation Authority’s Prudential Standards.
Additionally, in accordance with the ASXCGC Principles and
Recommendations, HCF has posted copies of this Corporate
Governance Statement on its website www.hcf.com.au.
1.3 Compliance with the ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendations
The ASX listing rules require listed entities to include a
statement in their annual report disclosing the extent to
which they have followed the ASXCGC Principles and
Recommendations during the reporting period, identifying any
recommendations that have not been followed and providing
reasons for that variance. Although HCF is not a listed entity
and thus not required to comply with ASX listing rules, the
Board considers it appropriate to adopt the relevant
ASXCGC recommendations in the company’s governance
policies and practices.
2. DATE OF THIS STATEMENT
This Corporate Governance Statement reflects HCF’s corporate
governance policies and practices as at 27 August 2009.
3. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
a) Membership and expertise of the Board
The Board has a broad range of relevant financial and other
skills, experience and expertise to meet its objectives. The
Board composition as at the date of the last annual report, with
details of each Director’s background, is set out in the Directors’
Report on pages 56 to 59 of the Annual Report. The Board
considers that the current non-executive Directors bring the
right mix of skills, knowledge, expertise and experience
necessary to govern the HCF Group. Of the nine current
non-executive Directors, two have financial experience, four
have specific healthcare and legal experience and three have
extensive business experience. All Directors have experience
of the social and environmental context in which the
businesses operate. The Board’s approach to selection,
performance evaluation and tenure of Directors is described
below.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.6
b) Board role and responsibility
The roles and responsibilities of the Board are formalised in
the Board Charter. The Board Charter also defines the matters
that are reserved for the Board and its Committees, and those
that the Board has delegated to management. In summary, the
Board is accountable to its constituents and contributors for
HCF’s performance and its responsibilities include:
- strategy – providing strategic direction and approving
corporate strategic initiatives;
- board performance and composition – evaluating the
performance of non-executive Directors, and determining
the size and composition of the HCF Board as well as
approving the selection of appropriate persons for
appointment and election as Directors;
- leadership selection – evaluating the performance of
and selecting the Chief Executive Officer [CEO];
- succession planning – planning for Board and
executive succession;
- remuneration – setting CEO remuneration, and setting
non-executive Director remuneration within guidelines
furnished by the independent external remuneration
consultants, subject to the approval of Members;
- financial performance – approving HCF’s operating
plan and budget, monitoring management and financial
performance;
- financial reporting – considering and approving HCF’s
annual financial statements;
- audit – selecting and recommending to constituents the
appointment of the external auditor. Determining the
duration, remuneration and terms of appointment of the
external auditor and evaluating their performance and
ongoing independence. Maintaining a direct and ongoing
dialogue with the external auditor;
- risk management – approving HCF’s risk management
strategy and monitoring its effectiveness;
- corporate responsibility – considering the social, ethical
and environmental impact of HCF’s activities, setting
standards and monitoring compliance with those
standards; and
- relationship with regulators – maintaining dialogues with
the Private Health Insurance Administration Council
[PHIAC], the Commonwealth Department of Health and
Ageing [DoHA], the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission [ASIC], the Australian Prudential Regulation
Authority [APRA] and other regulators.
The Board has delegated a number of these responsibilities to
its Committees. The responsibilities of these Committees are
detailed in section 4 of this Corporate Governance Statement.
The Board has delegated to management responsibility for:
- strategy – developing and implementing corporate
strategies and making recommendations on significant
corporate strategic initiatives;
- senior management selection – making recommendations
for the appointment of senior management, determining
terms of appointment, evaluating performance, and
developing and maintaining succession plans for senior
management roles;
- financial performance – developing HCF’s annual
operating plan and budget and managing day-to-day
operations within the budget;
- risk management – maintaining an effective risk
management framework;
- continuous disclosure – keeping the Board fully informed
about material developments; and
- corporate responsibility – managing day-to-day operations
in accordance with standards for social, ethical and
environmental practices, which have been set by
the Board.
HCF’s Board Charter is available in the corporate governance
section of its website at www.hcf.com.au
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 1.1
c) Board size and composition
As at the date of this Corporate Governance Statement there
are nine independent non-executive Directors and one
executive Director on the Board. The Constitution provides
for a maximum of eleven Directors. On the recommendation
of the Nominations Committee the Board appoints up to
six independent non-executive Directors and selects four
independent non-executive Directors for election by voting
contributors. The Board appoints the Chief Executive Officer
as the sole executive Director.
The Nominations Committee assesses the Board composition
and size from time to time and may make recommendations to
the Board for changes to the Board composition and size. The
Nominations Committee also assesses the skills required to
discharge the Board’s duties, having regard to HCF’s business
mix, financial position and strategic direction, including specific
qualities or skills that the Nominations Committee believes are
necessary for one or more of the Directors to possess.
d) The selection and role of the Chairman of the Board
The Directors elect one of the independent non-executive
Directors to be Chairman. The Chairman’s role includes:
- ensuring that, when all Board members take office, they
undertake appropriate induction covering the terms of
their appointment, their duties and responsibilities;
- providing effective leadership on formulating the
Board’s strategy;
- representing the views of the Board to the public;
- ensuring the Board meets at regular intervals throughout
the year, and that minutes of meetings accurately record
decisions taken and, where appropriate, the views of
individual Directors;
- guiding the agenda and conduct of all Board meetings; and
- reviewing the performance of non-executive Directors.
The current Chairman of the Board, John Dunlop, is an
independent non-executive Director. He has been a Director
since 1997 and Chairman of HCF since March 2009. The
Chairman is a member of each Board Committee and Chairman
of the Nominations and Remuneration Committees.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.2, 2.3
e) Director independence
HCF’s Constitution requires that a majority of the Directors
must be independent and specifies the criteria to be used to
determine whether a Director is independent. The criteria are:
1. The Directors must affirmatively determine whether or
not a Director is independent, initially at the time of
appointment or election and thereafter on a periodic
basis. Each Director must provide the Directors with
all information required by the Directors to make their
determination. Each Director must also, whenever
requested to do so, affirm to the Directors whether
or not the Director is independent.
2. To be independent, a Director must be independent
of management and free from any business or other
relationship that could materially interfere with, or
could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere
with, the exercise by the Director of unfettered and
independent judgment.
3. A Director will be regarded as independent when
the Director:
(a) has not within the last three years been employed
in an executive capacity by the Company or any
controlled entity of the Company, or been a Director
after ceasing to hold that employment;
(b) has not within the last three years been associated
with, or a principal of, a material professional advisor
or material consultant to the Company or any
controlled entity of the Company or an employee
materially associated with the service provided;
(c) is not a material supplier or customer of the Company
or any controlled entity of the Company or an officer
of or otherwise directly or indirectly associated with
a material supplier or customer and has no material
contractual relationship with the Company or any
controlled entity of the Company other than as
a Director;
(d) has not served as a Director for a period which could,
or could reasonably be perceived to, materially
interfere with the Director’s ability to act in the
best interests of the Company (and, to the extent
required by the Private Health Insurance Act 2007,
the interests of the Contributors); and
(e) is otherwise free from any interest and any business or
other relationship which could, or could reasonably
be perceived to, materially interfere with the Director’s
ability to act in the best interests of the Company (and,
to the extent required by the Private Health Insurance
Act 2007, the interests of the Contributors).
4. The Directors may determine that a Director is
independent notwithstanding the existence of a
relationship (including any of these specific relationships),
where the Directors determine that the relationship could
not materially interfere with, or could not reasonably be
perceived to materially interfere with, the exercise by
the Director of unfettered and independent judgment.
5. A relationship is material where the value of goods or
services provided to or by the Company over the past
three years accounts, in aggregate, for more than 5%
of the gross revenue or expenses of either the Company
or the other party over that three year period.
6. A lack of independence does not disqualify a Director.
However, where the Directors determine that a Director is
not independent, the Directors must decide the extent to
which the lack of independence should be addressed by an
alternative mechanism, such as:
(a) disclosure of the facts and circumstances giving rise
to the lack of independence in the annual report of
the Company;
(b) excluding the Director from being present at any
meeting at which a matter that is compromised
by the lack of independence is being considered
or decided; and
(c) approving participation by the Director at any
meeting at which a matter that is compromised
by the lack of independence is being considered
or decided, subject to any appropriate conditions.
Any or all of these alternative mechanisms may be appropriate
in any given circumstances. The Directors will determine what
is appropriate.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.1, 2.6
f) Avoidance of conflicts of interest by a Director
The Board is conscious of its obligations to ensure that
Directors avoid conflicts of interest [both real and apparent]
between their duty to HCF and their own interests. The Board
has adopted a procedure to ensure that conflicts and potential
conflicts of interest of Directors are disclosed to the Board.
Any Directors with a material personal interest in a matter
being considered by the Board must declare their interest and,
unless the Board resolve otherwise, they may not participate in
boardroom discussions or vote on matters on which they face
a conflict.
In addition, Directors are required to disclose any
actual or potential conflict of interest on appointment as a
Director and are required to keep these disclosures up to date.
Directors may not make any representations or agreements on
behalf of HCF unless such an authority is explicitly delegated
by the Board, through a resolution to the director either
individually, or as a member of a Board committee.
g) Meetings of the Board and its conduct
The Board has up to eleven scheduled meetings each year and
meets whenever necessary between scheduled meetings to deal
with specific matters needing attention. The Board meets
annually to discuss HCF’s strategic plan and set the overall
strategic direction of the organisation. The Chairman and the
CEO establish meeting agendas, for assessing HCF’s coverage of
financial, strategic and major risk areas, throughout the year.
The Directors have the opportunity to review meeting materials
sufficiently in advance. Directors are always encouraged to
participate with a robust exchange of views and to bring their
independent judgements to bear on the issues and decisions
at hand. In addition to their formal meetings, the Board
undertakes periodic development seminars to enhance
Directors’ knowledge of governance matters and related key
issues facing HCF. Over the past year these included discussions
on HCF’s succession planning, International Financial
Reporting Standards, organisational strategy, technology
and IT strategy, risk management, regulatory compliance and
Australian economic conditions. Senior managers attend Board
meetings quarterly to present a Review of Operations for their
business units and are personally questioned by Directors on
their responsibilities, performance, problem areas and action
programs for improvement. Senior managers are also available
to be contacted by Directors between meetings. The Board
meets without executive management at least once a year or as
required.
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee meets with
HCF’s external auditors without executive management being
present at the conclusion of each Audit, Risk and Compliance
Committee meeting. Meetings attended by Directors for the
past financial year are reported in the Directors’ Report.
Minutes are kept and reviewed by the Chairman and then
approved by Committee Members at the following meeting.
Minute books are retained.
h) Succession planning
The Board (through the Nominations Committee) plans
succession of its own members and is responsible for developing
and implementing succession planning for non-executive
Directors, taking into account the challenges and opportunities
facing HCF and the skills and expertise which are needed by
the Board in the future. The Board is responsible for CEO
succession planning.
i) Review of Board performance
The Board undertakes ongoing self-assessment and reviews the
performance of the Board, Board Committees and individual
Directors annually. This is to ensure that the Board and Board
Committees are working effectively. The performance review
process is conducted internally and includes written surveys
of Directors based on best practice questionnaires designed
by “big four” accountancy firms. These reviews are wideranging
and include, amongst other things, each Director’s
contributions to Board discussions, best features and
recommendations for improvement. The survey results are
collated by the Company Secretary and the results reviewed
by the Board and Board Committees.
A performance review for the Board, its Committees and
Directors was conducted in the reporting period in accordance
with this process.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.5, 2.6
j) Nomination and appointment of new HCF Directors
HCF has a maximum of 11 Directors: Up to six Directors
may be appointed by the incumbent Directors and up to four
Directors may be elected by voting contributors. The Chief
Executive Officer, who is appointed by the Directors, is
automatically appointed as a Director. Potential candidates
for appointment or elections as Directors are first selected by
the Nominations Committee and then submitted to the Board
for approval. The Nominations Committee reviews potential
candidates by reference to the Director Eligibility criteria
specified in the Constitution, having regard to the potential
candidate’s experience and other qualities. Voting contributors
are invited to nominate candidates for election as Directors.
External consultants may also be used to access a wide base
of potential candidates. Those selected are assessed by the
Board against the Director Eligibility Criteria specified in the
Constitution, including background, experience, professional
skills, personal qualities, whether their skills and experience will
complement the existing Board and their availability to commit
themselves to the Board’s activities. New Directors receive a
Letter of Appointment, which sets out their duties, their terms
and conditions of appointment including expected term of
appointment, and the expectations of the role and remuneration.
If the Board appoints a new Director during the year to fill a
casual vacancy in the position of a Director elected by voting contributors, that person must stand for election by voting
contributors at the next election. Voting contributors are
provided with relevant information on the candidates for
election. The Nominations Committee reviews appointment
criteria from time to time and makes recommendations
concerning the re-election of any Director by voting
contributors or appointment of any Director by the Board.
As part of the process of considering whether to support the
re-election of a Director, the Nominations Committee conducts
a peer review of that Director during the year in which that
Director will become eligible for re-election.
k) Term in office and retirement and re-election of Directors
HCF’s Constitution states that at each annual general meeting
one-third of its Directors, excluding the CEO, must retire.
Retiring Directors are eligible for consideration by the
Nominations Committee for re-appointment by the Board
or re-election by voting contributors. The Nominations
Committee evaluates the contribution of retiring Directors
through a peer review process. The maximum time that each
Director can serve in any single term is three years. The Board
has not specified the maximum number of terms of office that
any Director may serve.
l) Director education
When appointed to the Board, all new Directors undergo an
informal induction program appropriate to their experience
to familiarise them with matters relating to HCF’s business,
strategy and any current issues before the Board. The induction
program includes meetings with the Chairman, the CEO, each
Chairman of the respective Board Committees, each General
Manager and the Company Secretary. The Board ensures
Directors continue their education by participating in
appropriate programs and attending relevant worksite visits.
This allows existing Directors time in each business area to
gain a greater understanding of key issues. HCF’s Company
Secretary provides Directors with ongoing guidance on matters
such as corporate governance, HCF’s Constitution and the law.
m) Board access to information and advice
All Directors have unrestricted access to company records
and information and receive regular detailed financial and
operational reports from executive management to enable
them to carry out their duties. Each Director enters into an
Access and Indemnity Deed with HCF to ensure seven year
access to documents after retirement as a Director. The
Chairman and other non-executive Directors regularly consult
with the CEO, the CFO, the Company Secretary, the General
Manager Group Risk Management, the Group Compliance
Manager, and other General Managers and may consult with,
and request additional information from, any HCF employee.
The Board, and each Director individually, has the right to seek
independent professional advice, at HCF’s expense, to help
them carry out their responsibilities. While the Chairman’s prior
approval is needed, it may not be unreasonably withheld and, in
the Chairman’s absence, approval of the Board may be sought.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.6
n) Company Secretary
The Group Company Secretary is Ian McDonald, FCA.
Mr McDonald joined HCF in 1991 as Chief Internal Auditor
and was appointed to his present role in September 2006 with
responsibility for the management and delivery of company
secretarial, legal, compliance and risk management services
to the HCF Group. Prior to Ian’s current appointment he was
HCF’s General Manager Finance (Chief Financial Officer)
from October 1995 and was a partner at Touche Ross & Co /
KPMG from 1979 to 1991 providing assurance, financial and
taxation consulting services to large and medium sized public
companies. Responsibilities for the secretarial function include
providing advice to Directors and officers on corporate
governance and regulatory matters, developing and
implementing HCF’s governance framework and giving
practical effect to the Board’s decisions. All Directors have
access to advice from the Company Secretary.
4. BOARD COMMITTEES
a) Board Committees and membership
There are currently three Board Committees of HCF whose
powers and procedures are governed by HCF’s Constitution
and the relevant Committee’s Charter, as approved by the
Board. The Board Committees and their membership at
27 August 2009 are set out in the table following.
b) Committee Charters
The roles and responsibilities of each Committee are set out in
the respective Committee Charters, which are reviewed annually.
Copies of the Committee Charters are available in the corporate
governance section at HCF’s website www.hcf.com.au.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 4.3
c) Committee procedures
Operation of the Committees and reporting to the Board
The Board’s Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee meets
quarterly. The Nominations Committee meets annually and at
other times if required. The Remuneration Committee meets
as necessary. Each Committee is entitled to the resources and
information it requires, including direct access to employees
and advisers as well as appropriate funding. The CEO, senior
executives, other selected employees and external independent
experts are invited to attend Committee meetings as necessary.
All independent Directors receive all Committee papers and
can attend all Committee meetings, subject to there not being
any conflict of interest.
Composition and independence of the Committees
Committee members are chosen for the skills, experience
and other qualities they bring to the Committees. The Audit,
Risk and Compliance Committee is required to have all
independent non-executive Directors as members. The
Nominations Committee is composed of all independent
non-executive Directors. When independent non-executive
Directors are being considered for re-appointment or reelection
as Directors, they do not participate as members
of the Nominations Committee unless and until they are
re-appointed or re-elected. The Remuneration Committee
is composed of three independent non-executive Directors.
How the Committees report to the Board
Following each Committee meeting, the Board is given an
oral report by the Chairperson of each Committee. All
Minutes of meetings of Committees are distributed to every
independent Director.
How Committees’ performance is evaluated
The performance of Committees is surveyed using “best
practice” questionnaires. Results, including the identification
of strengths, weaknesses and recommended improvements, are
discussed and reviewed initially within each Committee and
then reviewed by the Board. The performance of each
Committee member is evaluated as part of the performance
review of each independent non-executive Director.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.5
| Membership of Board and Board Committees as at 27 August 2009 |
| Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee |
|
Nominations Committee# |
|
Renumeration Committee |
|
C L Clifton
S P Coppock
J A B Dunlop
R J Goaley
J R O’Dea
M E Rummery
R J Schneider
L J Stone
G W Wright*
|
|
C L Clifton
S P Coppock
J A B Dunlop*
R J Goaley
J R O’Dea
M E Rummery
R J Schneider
L J Stone
G W Wright |
|
J A B Dunlop*
J R O’Dea
R J Schneider
|
|
* Denotes Committee Chairman
# Those Directors who seek reappointment are excluded from those meetings
where independence/ conflict of interest is an issue.
Attendances of Directors at Committee meetings are set out in
the Directors’ Report.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.6, 4.4, 8.3
d) Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee
Role of the Committee
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee, which comprises
all the independent non-executive Directors, oversees all
matters concerning:
- integrity of the financial statements and financial
reporting systems;
- making recommendations to the Board for the
appointment of the external auditor;
- making recommendations to the Board for the
appointment of the Appointed Actuary
- external auditor’s qualifications, performance and
independence;
- performance of the internal audit function;
- the identification, assessment, controls and treatment
of risks;
- fraud control; and
- compliance with financial reporting and related regulatory
requirements including the financial condition report of
the Appointed Actuary.
The Board approves the external and internal audit plans on the
recommendation of the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee.
The Committee ensures that all recommendations arising from
internal and external audits are reviewed and implemented
where appropriate and reasons given when recommendations
have not been implemented.
The Committee is provided with a status report for all
recommendations provided by the internal and external
auditors for which it is agreed action is required. These reports
include responsible officers and implementation dates. Minutes
of the Committee meetings are included in the papers provided
to all independent Directors.
Integrity of the financial statements
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee considers
whether the accounting methods applied by management are
consistent and comply with applicable accounting standards
and concepts. The Committee reviews and assesses:
- any significant estimates and judgements in financial
reports and monitors the methods used to account for
unusual transactions;
- the processes used to monitor and ensure compliance with
laws, regulations and other requirements relating to external
reporting of financial and non-financial information; and
- the major financial risk exposures and the process
surrounding the disclosures made by senior executives
in connection with their personal certifications of their
respective responsibility for information disclosed in the
annual financial statements.
External audit
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee is responsible
for making recommendations to the Board concerning the
appointment of HCF’s external auditor and the terms of
engagement. The Committee reviews the performance of
the external auditor and regularly reviews its policy on the
independence of the external auditor. This evaluation includes
an annual review of the external auditor’s internal quality
control procedures and consideration of any inquiry or
investigation by governmental or professional authorities,
within the preceding three years in respect of assignments
carried out by the external auditor. As well, the capabilities of
the lead audit engagement staff are reviewed. The independent
external auditor reports on their findings to this Committee
and to the Board. For permitted non-audit services, use of the
external audit firm must be assessed in accordance with HCF’s
pre-approval policy, which requires that all non-audit services be
pre-approved by the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee,
by delegated authority to a sub-committee consisting of one or
more members where appropriate. The external auditor receives
all Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee papers and attends
all Committee meetings. The Committee also meets with the
external auditor and Appointed Actuary without management
being present. Committee members are able to contact the
external auditor and Appointed Actuary directly at any time.
Internal audit
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee approves the
appointment and replacement of the Chief Internal Auditor
and reviews the internal audit responsibilities, budget and
staffing. The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee
Chairman meets separately with the Chief Internal Auditor.
Appointed Actuary
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee is responsible
for making recommendations to the Board concerning the
appointment of the Appointed Actuary and the terms of
engagement. The Committee reviews the Appointed
Actuary’s performance.
Compliance with financial reporting and related
regulatory requirements
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee is responsible for
ensuring compliance with applicable financial reporting and
related regulatory requirements. The Committee, amongst
other things:
- discusses with management and the external auditor, HCF’s
major financial risk exposures and the steps management has
taken to monitor and control such exposures, including
HCF’s risk assessment and risk management policies;
- discusses with the external auditors their report regarding
significant findings in the conduct of their audit and the
adequacy of management’s response;
- discusses with management, the external auditor and
Appointed Actuary the annual financial statements;
- discusses with management, the external auditor and
Appointed Actuary correspondence with regulators or
government agencies and reports which raise issues of
a material nature;
- discusses with the Company Secretary legal matters that
may have a material impact on the financial statements
and/or HCF’s compliance with financial reporting and
related regulatory policies; and
- establishes procedures for the receipt, retention and
treatment of financial complaints, including accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the
confidential or anonymous submission by employees of
concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.
Financial knowledge of Committee members
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee includes
members who have appropriate financial experience and
an understanding of the industry in which HCF operates.
All members of the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee
satisfy the independence requirements under the ASXCGC
Best Practice Recommendations and PHIAC Industry
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee relies on the
information provided by management, the external auditor and
the Appointed Actuary. Management determines that HCF’s
financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate.
The external auditor has the duty to plan and conduct audits.
Further information on audit governance and independence is
included in section 5 of this Corporate Governance Statement.
Risk Management oversight
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee oversees the risk
profile of HCF within the context of the risk-reward strategy
determined by the Board. The determination of this strategy
includes recommendations from the CEO and senior
management on the parameters of the HCF Group’s risk-reward
profile and appropriate strategy. The Committee monitors the
alignment of risk profile with current and future capital /
liquidity requirements and oversees the risks inherent in
HCF’s operations. For all risk types this includes:
- reviewing and approving the frameworks for managing
HCF’s operational and compliance risks;
- ensuring effective monitoring of the risk profile,
performance, and management and control of HCF’s risks;
- ensuring the development and ongoing review of appropriate policies that support HCF frameworks for
managing risk;
- determining, approving and reviewing the limits and
conditions that apply to the taking of risk, including the
authority delegated by the Board to the Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Manager
Group Risk Management;
- The Committee reviews significant issues that may be
raised by internal audit as well as the length of time and
action taken to resolve such issues. At an individual risk
type level the following are included:
- reviewing and approving HCF’s provisioning
methodology;
- reviewing and approving HCF’s funding plan and
ensuring appropriate monitoring of funding and
liquidity requirements;
- operational risk – reviewing the risk that arises from
inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems or from external events; and
- compliance risk – ensuring processes are in place to
anticipate and effectively manage the impact of
regulatory change on HCF’s operations, and
overseeing compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and regulatory requirements, reviewing
and discussing with management and the external
auditor any correspondence with regulators or
government agencies and any published reports that
raise material issues for HCF, and ensuring procedures
exist for appropriately managing complaints and
whistleblower concerns.
The Committee routinely updates the Board about its activities
quarterly and also monthly if significant new risks emerge.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 4.1, 4.2
e) Nominations Committee
Role of the Committee
The primary function of the Nominations Committee is
performing review procedures to assist the Board in fulfilling its
oversight responsibility by ensuring that the Board comprises
individuals best able to discharge the responsibilities of
Directors, having regard to the law and the highest standards
of governance. The Committee is responsible for:
- developing and reviewing policies on Board composition,
strategic function and size;
- performance review process of the Board, its Committees
and individual Directors;
- developing and implementing induction programs for new
Directors and ongoing education for existing Directors;
- assessing eligibility of potential candidates nominated for
election as Directors;
- recommending potential candidates for appointment or
election as Directors to the Board;
- reviewing Director independence;
- succession planning for the Board;
- reviewing HCF’s corporate governance policies to ensure
they meet Australian corporate governance standards; and
- considering whether HCF meets relevant corporate
governance standards under legislation and of various
regulatory bodies, including PHIAC, ASIC and APRA.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 2.4, 2.5
f) Remuneration Committee
Role of the Committee
The Remuneration Committee assists the Board by working to
ensure that HCF has remuneration policies and practices that
fairly and responsibly reward executives. The Committee’s
decision on reward structures are based on business performance,
legal obligations and high standards of corporate governance.
The Committee’s purpose is to:
- review and approve executive remuneration policy;
- review and recommend to the Board on corporate goals
and objectives relevant to the CEO, and the performance
of the CEO in light of these objectives;
- recommend to the Board on the remuneration of the CEO;
- approve remuneration packages for positions reporting directly to the CEO;
- review and recommend to the Board, on the advice of
independent external consultants, Directors’ fees;
- approve all performance recognition expenditure; and
- oversee general remuneration practices across the HCF Group.
The Committee also reviews and recommends to the Board on
the recruitment, retention, termination, and succession planning
policies and procedures for the CEO and senior positions
reporting directly to the CEO. Independent remuneration
consultants are engaged by the Committee to ensure that HCF’s
reward practices and levels are consistent with market practice.
Remuneration of non-executive Directors comprises Directors
fees and superannuation contributions. Remuneration of the
Executive Director and senior executives comprises a
combination of fixed remuneration that reflects core
performance requirements and expectations and performance
based remuneration that is linked to clearly specified
performance targets.
A performance review for senior executives was conducted in
this reporting period in accordance with this process.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 1.2, 1.3, 8.1, 8.2.
5. AUDIT GOVERNANCE AND INDEPENDENCE
a) Approach to audit governance
The Board is committed to three basic principles:
- that HCF’s financial reports present a true and fair view;
- that HCF’s accounting methods are comprehensive and relevant and comply with applicable accounting rules and
policies; and
- that the external auditor is independent.
Australian and international developments are monitored.
b) Engagement and rotation of the external auditor
HCF’s independent external auditor is Ernst & Young. Ernst &
Young was appointed by Members at the 1985 annual general
meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations
Act. The Board has adopted a policy that the responsibilities of
the lead audit partner cannot be performed by the same person
for longer than five years. The present Ernst & Young lead
audit partner for HCF’s audit is Andrew Price who assumed
this responsibility in 2005. The Board requires a minimum
five-year ‘cooling off’ period before an audit partner is allowed
back onto the audit team.
c) Certification and discussions with the external auditor
on independence
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee requires the
external auditors to confirm quarterly to the Committee that
they have maintained their independence and have complied
with the independence standards as promulgated by Australian
regulators and professional bodies. Periodically, the Committee
meets separately with the external auditors without executive
management being present. Certification is provided in the
Non-Audit Services and Independence declaration in the
Directors’ Report.
d) Relationship with the external auditor
HCF’s current policies on employment and other relationships
with its external auditors include the following:
- the audit partners and any employee of the external
audit firm on the HCF audit are prohibited from being
an officer of HCF;
- an immediate family member of an audit partner or any
employee of the external audit firm on the HCF audit is
prohibited from being a Director or an officer in a
significant position at HCF;
- any former external audit partner or external audit firm’s
former employees who have participated on HCF audits
are prohibited from becoming a Director or officer in a
significant position at HCF for at least three years, and
after the three years can have no continuing financial
relationship with the audit firm;
- members of the audit team and audit firm are prohibited
from having a business relationship with HCF or any
officer of HCF unless the relationship is clearly
insignificant to both parties;
- officers of HCF are prohibited from receiving any
remuneration from the external audit firm; and
- the audit team in any given year cannot include a person
who had been an officer of HCF during that year.
e) Restrictions on non-audit services by the external auditor
To avoid possible independence or conflict issues, the external
auditor is not permitted to carry out certain types of non-audit
services for HCF, including:
- preparation of accounting records and financial statements;
- financial information systems design and implementation;
- appraisal or valuation services and other corporate finance
activities;
- internal audit services;
- temporary or permanent staff assignments, or performing
any decision-making or ongoing monitoring or
management functions;
- legal, litigation or other expert services;
- recruitment services for managerial, executive or Director
positions; and
- for all other non-audit services, use of the external audit
firm must be assessed in accordance with HCF’s preapproval
policy, which requires that all non-audit services
be pre-approved by the Chairman of the Audit, Risk and
Compliance Committee.
The breakdown of the aggregate fees billed by the external
auditor in respect of each of the two most recent financial
years for audit, audit-related, tax and other services is provided
in the 2009 Annual Financial Report.
f) Attendance at the Annual General Meeting
HCF’s external auditor attends the annual general meeting
and is available to answer questions from Members on:
- the conduct of the audit;
- the preparation and content of the audit report;
- the accounting policies adopted by HCF in relation
to the preparation of the financial statements; and
- the independence of the auditor in relation to the
conduct of the audit.
6. CONTROLLING AND MANAGING RISK
a) Approach to risk management
HCF approaches risk management by identifying, assessing and
managing the risks that affect its businesses in accordance with
a set of core risk management values. This approach enables the
risks to be balanced against appropriate rewards and reflects HCF’s
vision and values, objectives and strategies, and procedures and
training. HCF distinguishes four main types of risk:
- business risk – the exposure to changing government
policies, new legislation, price control and fraud;
- operational risk – the risk that arises from inadequate
or failed internal processes, people and systems or from
external events;
- financial risk – associated with achieving revenue
and income growth targets including fluctuations in
investment markets impacting on HCF’s investment
portfolio; and
- compliance risk – the risk of failing to comply with all
applicable legal and regulatory requirements and industry
codes of practice, and to meet HCF’s ethical standards.
In addition to and linked to these four main types of risk,
HCF allocates resources to manage the following risks:
- claims risk – the risk of not being able to meet
contributors’ claims for benefits;
- liquidity risk – the risk of failing to adequately fund cash
demand in the short term;
- reputational risk – the risk of negative experiences and
perceptions impacting HCF’s standing with stakeholders;
and
- strategic risk – the risk associated with the vulnerability of
a line of business to changes in the strategic environment.
As these risks are interlinked, HCF takes an integrated
approach to managing them.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 7.1.
b) Risk management roles and responsibilities
The Board is responsible for reviewing and approving HCF’s
risk management strategy, frameworks and key risk parameters.
HCF’s risk management governance structure is set out in the
table in this section. Approval of HCF’s risk management
framework and significant policies resides with the Audit, Risk
and Compliance Committee under powers delegated by the
Board. Executive management is responsible for implementing
the Board approved risk management strategy and developing
policies, controls, processes and procedures to identify and
manage risks in all of HCF’s activities. HCF’s business model
recognises that the responsibility for managing risks inherent
in its business lies with the business units. This responsibility
includes developing business unit specific policies, controls,
procedures and monitoring and reporting capability, and is
aligned with the risk frameworks approved by the Audit, Risk
and Compliance Committee.
c) CEO and CFO assurance
The Board receives regular reports about the financial
condition and operational results of HCF and its subsidiaries.
The CEO and CFO annually provide formal statements to the
Board that in all material respects that the financial records
of the company for the financial year have been properly
maintained in that they:
- correctly record and explain its transactions and financial
position and performance;
- enable true and fair financial statements to be prepared
and audited; and
- are retained for seven years after the transactions covered
by the records are completed.
HCF’s risk management governance structure Board
Considers and approves the risk-reward strategy of HCF
including social, environmental, ethical responsibility and
reputational risk.
Board Committees
Audit, Risk and Nominations Remuneration
Compliance Committee Committee Committee
Integrity of financial Board experience, mix Responsible reward
statements and systems of skills, succession practices in line
and governance with performance
Risk profile and
risk management
Group Risk Monitoring
- Drives HCF’s risk management culture, frameworks and
reviews of assessments for maximum performance in line
with risk appetite;
- ensures risk management is a competitive advantage,
delivers better solutions for customers, protects capital
and grows surplus, and builds stakeholder value; and
- forges a partnership with the business, which shares the
vision and the responsibility for superior risk management.
Business Units
- Manage risks inherent in the business including the
development of business-specific policies, controls,
procedures and reporting in respect of the risk classes;
• the financial statements, and notes required by the
accounting standards for the financial year comply
with the accounting standards;
- the financial statements and notes for the financial year
give a true and fair view of the company’s and consolidated
Group’s financial position and of their performance; and
- the risk management and internal compliance and control
systems are sound, appropriate and operating efficiently
and effectively.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 7.2 7.4.
d) Internal review and risk evaluation
The Risk Management and Compliance managers together
with the Chief Internal Auditor provide independent
assurance to the Board, executive management and external
auditor on the adequacy and effectiveness of management
controls for risk. The compliance function also carries out
activities that measure the effectiveness of compliance risk
management as provided in more detail below.
e) Compliance framework
HCF’s compliance framework is driven by a strong culture
of compliance and a series of principles and practices:
- compliance is the responsibility of every staff member;
- complying with both the letter and spirit of regulatory
standards;
- embedding compliance in how HCF conducts its businesses;
- visibility and accountability of senior management to
ensure a strong compliance culture;
- advice and assistance are provided by a dedicated
compliance function; and
- active engagement in meetings to ensure high standards
for the industry in which HCF operates.
Primary responsibility for managing compliance risk resides
with business unit line management, who are required to
demonstrate that they have effective processes in place
consistent with HCF’s compliance principles and practices.
Within each major business area there is a clear compliance
function, with specific responsibilities designed to guide
compliance within that business as part of the business unit
risk management team. The compliance framework utilises a
range of mechanisms, including audit, file reviews, customer
surveys and operational risk assessments to measure the
effectiveness of the HCF Group compliance programs. The
compliance framework is established and maintained by the
Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee which receives regular
reports from the Compliance Manager and Risk Manager on
the status of compliance across the HCF Group. Key components
of the framework established to support these principles include:
- environment – board and management oversight and
accountability, culture and independence;
- identification – identifying obligations, compliance plans
and implementing change;
- controls – policies, processes, procedures, communications
and training, documentation; and
- monitoring and reporting – monitoring, incident and
breach escalation, reporting, issue management and
managing regulatory relationships.
7. PROMOTING ETHICAL AND
RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR
a) HCF’s Code of Conduct
HCF’s Code of Conduct sets out the principles that govern
HCF’s conduct and the behaviour that stakeholders can expect
from HCF. The Code of Conduct applies without exception
to all Directors, executives, management and employees,
and is aligned to HCF’s core values of teamwork, integrity,
achievement, responsibility and accountability. HCF’s Code of
Conduct sets out the foundation principles and operates under
the following key guidelines:
- act with honesty and integrity;
- respect the law and act accordingly;
- respect confidentiality and not misuse information;
- value and maintain professionalism;
- avoid conflicts of interest; and
- strive to be a good corporate citizen and achieve
community respect.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 3.1, 3.3.
b) Internal policies and procedures
Beyond HCF’s Code of Conduct, HCF complies with a range
of external industry codes, such as the AHIA Code of Conduct
and Electronic Funds Transfer Code of Conduct. In addition,
HCF has a number of key policies to manage its compliance
and human resource requirements. There are a range of
guidelines, communications and training processes and tools
to support these policies. These tools include the content of
the Compliance Portal of HCF’s Intranet, which forms part
of the staff induction process and the online compliance tests
that staff undertake. Individual business units also have systems
and procedures in place to support HCF policies.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 3.1, 3.3
c) Concern reporting and whistleblowing
Employees are actively encouraged to bring any problems to
the attention of management, the human resources team or the
Compliance Manager. This includes activities or behaviour that
may not be in accord with the Code of Conduct of HCF or the
industry, other HCF policies, or other regulatory requirements
or laws. HCF provides a mechanism to raise issues, including:
- raising issues concerning fraud directly with HCF’s Fraud
Control team;
- making suggestions for more efficient processes via the
online incident reporting facility; and
- raising concerns about “people issues” such as harassment or
discrimination directly with Human Resources management.
Concerns about breaches of our regulatory obligations or
internal policies or procedures can be raised anonymously with
the General Manager Risk and Compliance or the Chief
Internal Auditor. HCF has a Whistleblower Protection Policy to
protect individuals who make reports about suspected breaches
of HCF’s policies through these channels. The concern reporting
system complies with the whistleblower provisions of all relevant
legislative requirements and the Australian Standard AS 8004 –
Whistleblower Protection Programs for Entities.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 3.1, 3.3.
8. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
AND SUSTAINABILITY
a) Approach to corporate responsibility and sustainability
HCF aims to produce positive outcomes for all stakeholders
in managing its business and to maximize financial as well as
social and environmental value from our activities. In practice
this means having a commitment to transparency, fair dealing,
responsible treatment of employees and customers, and positive
links into the community.
Sustainable and responsible business practices within HCF are
integrated into and viewed as an important long term driver of
capacity, performance and reputation. Through such practices
HCF seeks to reduce operational and reputation risk, and
enhance operational efficiency, while contributing to a more
sustainable society. HCF accepts that the responsibilities on the
Board and management, which flow from this approach, go
beyond strict legal and financial obligations. In particular, HCF’s
Board seeks to take a practical and broad view of Directors’
fiduciary duties, in line with community expectations. HCF’s
corporate responsibility and sustainability approach goes beyond
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendations 3.1 and 10.1.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 3.1, 3.3.
b) Reporting on our corporate responsibility and
sustainability performance
HCF has been reporting on its social, ethical and environmental
performance through its Annual Report. HCF also seeks to
ensure that transparent and comprehensive reporting on all
dimensions of its performance is central to HCF’s approach to
governance and responsibility management. First and foremost
the reports seek to address the issues that matter most to
contributors, employees, other stakeholders and the community.
ASXCGC’s Best Practice Recommendation 3.1, 3.3
9. HCF LIFE POLICY
The economic entity includes a wholly owned life insurance
subsidiary, HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited (HCF
Life). HCF Life has a Board of six persons, four independent
Directors, the Managing Director of the subsidiary and the
Chief Executive Officer of the Parent Company. Currently
none of HCF Life’s independent Directors serve as Directors
of the Parent Company.
HCF Life’s independent Directors have specialised general
management, financial, investment management skills and
experience appropriate to life insurance and to meet the
onerous regulatory obligations imposed on directors of
companies in the industry.
The Life Board has an Audit Committee and a Risk and
Compliance Committee composed solely of the independent
Directors. Independent Directors other than the Life Board
Chairman chair these Committees.
A management committee, the Investments Committee, is
composed of the Managing Director and the Chief Financial
Officer (Life). The two non-executive directors Messrs
J.B. Gibson and R.G. Utz are attendees of the Investments
Committee meetings.
The Charters of HCF Life’s Board, Audit Committee and Risk
and Compliance Committee are published on HCF’s website
www.hcf.com.au.
The performance of Committees is surveyed using “best
practice” questionnaires. Results, including the identification
of strengths, weaknesses and recommended improvements, are
discussed and reviewed initially within each Committee and
then reviewed by the Board.
10. MANCHESTER UNITY POLICY
The economic entity includes a wholly owned jointly regulated
subsidiary, Manchester Unity Australia Ltd (Manchester Unity).
HCF acquired Manchester Unity on 24 December 2008.
Manchester Unity is both a friendly society under the Life
Insurance Act 1995 and a registered private health insurer
under the Private Health Insurance Act 2007. Manchester
Unity has a board of directors of nine persons, eight
independent Directors and the Managing Director of the
subsidiary who is also the Chief Executive Officer/Managing
Director of the Parent Company, HCF.
Manchester Unity’s board of directors is made up of nine of
HCF’s board of directors (Mr R. J. Goaley is the only HCF
director who does not sit on the Manchester Unity board
of directors). The board of directors considers that the
Manchester Unity non-executive directors bring the right
mix of skills, knowledge, expertise and experience necessary
to govern Manchester Unity. Of the nine directors, two have
financial experience, four have specific healthcare and legal
experience and three have extensive business experience
appropriate to meet the onerous regulatory obligations imposed
on directors of companies in both the friendly society and
health insurance industry. In addition, if necessary, the Board
can utilise the past experience and expertise of Mr R. J. Goaley,
a previous Chief Executive Officer, director and Chairman of
Manchester Unity.
Under Rule 7.1(3) of Manchester Unity’s constitution, the sole
member of Manchester Unity being HCF has the discretion
to appoint and remove directors. However, that discretion is
exercised in accordance with applicable APRA and PHIAC
standards and the Manchester Unity Board Charter. The
Manchester Unity Board Charter includes that every 3 years,
the Board shall conduct in consultation with its parent
company, a review and assessment of the composition of the
Board, with a view to making such changes to its composition
as considered appropriate and necessary to ensure its continued
independence, expertise and responsiveness to change.
The charter of Manchester Unity’s board is published on HCF’s
website www.hcf.com.au.
The Manchester Unity Board of Directors has an Audit,
Risk and Compliance Committee composed solely of the
independent Directors. An independent Director other than
Manchester Unity’s Board of Directors Chairman chairs this
Committee.
The Charter of Manchester Unity’s Board, Audit, Risk and
Compliance Committees is published on HCF’s website
www.hcf.com.au.
The performance of the Board and the Committee is surveyed
using “best practice” questionnaires. Results, including the
identification of strengths, weaknesses and recommended
improvements, are discussed and reviewed initially within
the Committee and then reviewed by the Board.
| Membership of Board and Board Committees as at 27 August 2009 |
Board |
|
Audit, Risk and
Compliance Committee |
|
C L Clifton
S P Coppock
J A B Dunlop*
J R O’Dea
M E Rummery
R J Schneider
T Smith
L J Stone
G W Wright
|
|
C L Clifton
S P Coppock
J A B Dunlop
J R O’Dea
M E Rummery
R J Schneider
L J Stone
G W Wright*
|
|
* Denotes Chairman
A management committee, the Investment Committee, is
composed of the Chief Financial Officer and the General
Counsel and Company Secretary of Manchester Unity and
the Group Financial Officer and Group Company Secretary
of HCF. Manchester Unity’s appointed actuary is an attendee
of the Investment Committee meetings. The Investment
Committee meets at least four times each year. The primary
purpose of the Investment Committee is to monitor and
review, on behalf of the Board:
- the performance and effectiveness of the Board approved
investment policy, strategy and rules of Manchester Unity
in achieving optimum return relative to risk in relation to
the management fund (excluding the retirement and aged
care assets), the friendly society benefit funds and the
health benefit fund;
- that reasonable care and due diligence is being used in the
investment, administration and management of the assets
of the benefit funds of Manchester Unity to ensure:
(a) compliance with Part 4 of the Life Act; and
(b) priority is given to the interests of owners and
prospective owners of policies referable to the
benefit fund; and
- that in the event of a conflict between the interests of
owners and prospective owners of relevant policies and
interests of Manchester Unity’s shareholder, Manchester
Unity gives priority to the interests of owners and
prospective owners of policies over the interests of
shareholders.
The Investment Committee reports to the Board after each
Committee meeting. |